Patients commonly referred
Referral is usually appropriate where conservative management has plateaued.
- Localised musculoskeletal pain with an identified structural target
- Post-injury cases that have plateaued on rehabilitation
- Patients asking about peptides who need a documented, evidence-grounded evaluation
- Longevity and metabolic optimisation requests you would rather not manage in a short visit
Where we decline
Red-flag neurological presentations, suspected infection or malignancy, unstable structural injury, and requests for compounds we consider inappropriate or unavailable for that patient. Declining is documented and returned to you with the reasoning.
What returns to your chart
An evaluation summary, the reasoning behind any plan, what was and was not recommended, monitoring parameters, and the review point. Co-management is the default assumption; we are not asking you to transfer the patient.
Questions people ask about this
- Do you take over the patient's primary care?
- No. Co-management is the default. The referring clinician remains the patient's primary relationship and receives documentation of everything we evaluate and recommend.
- What do you send back after the evaluation?
- A written summary covering findings, the reasoning, what was recommended and declined, monitoring parameters, and the review point.
- Can I get a profile page in your directory?
- Yes. Clinicians can submit a profile for review, which is published as a page of its own once checked for accuracy. A listing is informational and is not an endorsement.
Next step for clinicians
Referral guide and clinician profiles
The referral and co-management guide sets out criteria, documentation, and escalation in full. Clinicians who work with us can also publish a profile page in the directory.